Thursday, August 19, 2010

Whenever I hear a public figure complain about how the 'politically correct police' are constantly trying to censor them I throw up a little in my mouth.

Dr. Laura is the current example of this widespread phenomenon. Michael Savage, Rush, Beck, etc.. often complain about feeling constrained in what they are 'allowed to say'. How many times have you heard this; 'alright, I'll say it' followed by some bit of honesty and stupidity.

Well listen up fellow white folks, it's time for let's make a deal!

It amazes me that for these giants of communication, the simplest notions elude them so completely. Words are abstractions created by our bodies to communicate ideas and feelings from one sentient being to another. That's why the same idea can be transmitted in many languages, or from language to language.

If you are constantly feeling that you are not able to say what it is that you really want to say, let me help you figure out what's really going on.

1. You are not allowed to be racist (in your business, talk radio, etc...)
2. Different people have different ideas as to what constitutes racism
3. If you say the wrong thing, you will economically suffer

Ok, so I see how you can reach the conclusion that some things that are true, cannot be said because 'they're out to get you'. And I can see that you are confused and scared, but I'm here to help you.

The sneaking sinking feeling you get that stops you from saying something at some time is not actually your super keen anti PC police gaydar, it is in actuality...

Your Conscience.

It is your conscience that stops you, and you hate your conscience so very much. I can understand, it makes you feel bad about yourself. It's not very nice. It tries to stop you from saying the 'truth' all the time.

The words that you use are not the thing that others have a problem with. It is the ideas that form the words.

Let's use "Dr" Laura as an example here.

Here is an example where she is taking a very complicated issue, and trying to deal with it. Let's call it the N word for now.

Here is a word which is loaded with history and emotion. It evokes passion and fire at its very mention. To speak it aloud is to risk social and economic ruin for her.

Dr. Lauras point is a perfectly valid point and is a major question regarding race relations today.

Is it ok for one race to be treated differently from another?
Is that not the very essence of racism?

This is the part of the issue that I see as being the main stumbling block that modern whites in the US can't get past. Let's look at what she was talking about. She uses the example of comedians on HBO. So, I feel compelled to do the same. Let us however avoid the entire discussion of "nigga" for now, and focus on the actual "N-word".

The whole issue regarding the N-word is contained in the following very powerful word, CONTEXT.

So in this discussion with a black caller, Dr. Laura controls the narrative. The caller is in a mixed marriage and here's the beginning.

"CALLER: OK. Last night -- good example -- we had a neighbor come over, and this neighbor -- when every time he comes over, it's always a black comment. It's, "Oh, well, how do you black people like doing this?" And, "Do black people really like doing that?" And for a long time, I would ignore it. But last night, I got to the point where it --

SCHLESSINGER: I don't think that's racist."

Well, aside from the fact that it is racist (neighbor singles out the caller as the representative from black people here to educate her white neighbor as one who can be asked about "this" because she married a white guy) Dr Laura in her need to control the narrative (it is after all her show) decides that it isn't racist. And here we have the crux of the entire problem.

It is racist. It is plainly racist. The comments the caller describes are two very plainly racist comments. Sure, they are not inciting violence against a particular race, or denigrating a particular race, or comments containing any real negative intent towards a particular race, however they are comments which separate people into races and then assume knowing that the caller is black and the neighbor white that; a. there is a "black think" as described by Dr L, and; b. that the caller knows better what the "black think" is than the neighbor because she is black.

Now, I can see where the neighbor is coming from. He has some questions and is curious about what black people think. He is trying to have a dialogue, trying to learn. He isn't trying to be mean, hateful, spiteful, or anything negative at all.

But maybe we can see that the caller can justifiably be upset, even though the neighbor may have no ill intent whatsoever. Here she is in a mixed race marriage in a world that can be less than friendly toward such marriages. Here comes a neighbor who has some questions about black people, after all he's been told his entire life that 'they' think differently about things than him. So he asks them. Of her. Because she's black. Now she's Queen Caller from Blackyllvania, duly elected representative of all black opinion and ideas. Elected by her white neighbor. Because she's black.
Once again reminded that she is not just his neighbor. She's his black neighbor.

Well, if you can't see how night after night, she could at least get frustrated by this, then you are of no use to me.

Anyway Dr Laura immediately goes on to talk about Obama, claiming that "a lot of blacks voted for Obama simply 'cause he was half-black" and then in the same thought "the guys who were gonna start playing basketball. I was going to go out and play basketball. My bodyguard and my dear friend is a black man. And I said, "White men can't jump; I want you on my team." That was racist? That was funny".

I can see a problem there.

Help me Merriam Webster

Racism
1
: a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
2
: racial prejudice or discrimination

So, lets just ignore the first definition, for now.

Let's define prejudice and discrimination though.

Prejudice
1 : injury or damage resulting from some judgment or action of another in disregard of one's rights; especially : detriment to one's legal rights or claims
2 a (1) : preconceived judgment or opinion (2) : an adverse opinion or leaning formed without just grounds or before sufficient knowledge b : an instance of such judgment or opinion c : an irrational attitude of hostility directed against an individual, a group, a race, or their supposed characteristics

Discrimination

1 a : the act of discriminating b : the process by which two stimuli differing in some aspect are responded to differently
2 : the quality or power of finely distinguishing
3 a : the act, practice, or an instance of discriminating categorically rather than individually b : prejudiced or prejudicial outlook, action, or treatment


So now we have everything properly defined, thanks again to Merriam-Webster.

Racism can be defined as racial prejudice or discrimination.

Prejudice can be defined as preconceived judgment or opinion.
An adverse opinion or leaning formed without just grounds or before sufficient knowledge.
An instance of such judgment or opinion.
An irrational attitude of hostility directed against an individual, a group, a race, or their supposed characteristics.

So apparently the ill intent clause is not necessary for a thing to be considered racist, at least in the English language. It can be as simple as a preconceived notion as applied to race.

So let's get back on track.

Dr Laura immediately goes on to talk about Obama, claiming that "a lot of blacks voted for Obama simply 'cause he was half-black" and then in the same thought "the guys who were gonna start playing basketball. I was going to go out and play basketball. My bodyguard and my dear friend is a black man. And I said, "White men can't jump; I want you on my team." That was racist? That was funny".

The comment "a lot of blacks voted for Obama simply 'cause he was half-black" fits our definition of racism. So there's that.

And then there is the rather bizarre twist next, note the basketball reference...
"the guys who were gonna start playing basketball. I was going to go out and play basketball. My bodyguard and my dear friend is a black man. And I said, "White men can't jump; I want you on my team." That was racist? That was funny"

This is the equivalent of saying, "some of my best friends are black".

So Dr. Laura is going to play basketball, and feels comfortable enough with her black bodyguard to make a racist joke "White men can't jump; I want you on my team.". The white men can't jump cliche is a racist comment that denigrates whites, i.e. "racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race" in this case athletics. AKA, the first definition of racism from Merriam-Webster. But it's ok to Dr Laura as this does not denigrate blacks, the equivalence of self deprecating humor. And that may even be fine morally or whatever, however it is racist. Clearly.

What she doesn't get is that its humor (generously allowing the word here) comes from the fact that it is racist. She's white, he's black, they can be racist around each other because it's safe, they like each other and treat each other with respect, and there's no ill intent. It's forbidden, it's dirty, it's starting to sound like Dr L has other possible issues with her bodyguard. Wait a second, he's her bodyguard? He's her employee?? Her token black friend is her paid bodyguard?? Seriously?

That was funny?

So Dr Laura has given us at this point three examples of racism that are not racism, even though they really are.

Next.

The caller brings the N-word in. Oh boy!

Now Dr Lauras power is threatened. She is now upset because black people are allowed to do something that she is not, and that is to use the N-word.

Now, normally I would applaud a person who feels threatened by authority to confront that authority and rebel openly. But this just doesn't make that cut.

I was going to keep going but I will conclude with this.

If our public figures continue to be rewarded for their bad behavior, the will continue to behave badly. It is not just a matter of avoiding letting slip the stupid comment, but not believing the stupid things that make the stupid comment stupid, stupid! Ha parse that!

Seriously, it makes my soul tired to know that I am the same species as these people, and that they are what society laps up. We love it so much. This is why I don't watch TV anymore.

Saturday, June 6, 2009

Hey Newt-

I wonder what the response would be if a pol said negatively "We are drowning in Christianity"?

Bigotry is not hard to find, people.

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Douche of the Day


Today's Douche of the Day is a shared award, going to both the FCC and the Supreme Court.

They are still upholding the "seven dirty words", as if to say, "Don't worry folks, people are still stupid.".

Story

I truly feel this deserves a thoughtful and reasoned discussion, so here is a TRUE authority on the subject.

Saturday, April 18, 2009

Douche of the Day


Bernal Smith II is our Douche of the Day for today! And boy did he earn it!

Just a quick aside before the rest of this story, but I really wish we could as a society stop getting caught up in erratic emotional responses that are literally ruining kids lives every day. For really heartbreaking stories check out DetentionSlip.org. Girls getting suspended/expelled for taking a birth control pill, 5th graders being criminally charged for looking at porn on school computers, these parent are simply out of control. Maybe Parents themselves deserve DOTD status. It's a thought. Rant ending.

"Bernal Smith II oversees the Memphis Academy of Health Sciences(a publicly funded charter school) that publicly whips and paddles students every Friday in the "Chapel" ritual."
-http://www.detentionslip.org/2009/04/heavy-hitter-of-weak-bernal-smith-ii_03.html

Original story here
http://www.wreg.com/wreg-charterdiscipline-story,0,3557529.story

This guy is a real jackass, in the DetentionSlip.org email interaction, he claims to take evidence from both sides of the Corporal Punishment argument, but the only argument that he cites as informing his pro-CP stance is that he believes it works. Then he challenges his questioner to look up for themselves the evidence which he claims supports his position, because he can't show any. Oh, and never mind the fact that this is his justification for PUBLICLY FLOGGING CHILDREN!!! This guy should be in jail.

OK. I know that was confusing. Here's an example.

I say the sky is made of marshmallows. MMMMM.
You say the sky is not made of marshmallows and there are like 300000000 specific scientific sources stating that the sky is not marshmallows, and cite a few specifics for good measure.
Then you ask me for proof that the sky is marshmallows, to which I respond that I can't cite any sources, but you are very resourceful, so you should do it.
You shake your head and I walk away convinced that I won that debate.

Given the above example, just based on that, would you let me within 5000 miles of your childs education?

If you answered yes to above, you may very well qualify for tomorrows DOTD!

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Douche of the Day

Texas Governor Says Secession Possible

Governor Rick Perry- (R- Texas)

What's with all the douchebag governors Texas elects?

Honestly, I'd be glad to see them go at this point.

From his Wiki Article

Texas secession

In April 2009, Perry endorsed a resolution supporting state sovereignty as reserved by the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.[citation needed] On April 15 at a "tea party protest" he said, "Texas is a unique place. When we came into the union in 1845, one of the issues was that we would be able to leave if we decided to do that...My hope is that America and Washington in particular pays attention. We've got a great union. There's absolutely no reason to dissolve it. But if Washington continues to thumb their nose at the American people, who knows what may come of that."[47]


Saturday, April 11, 2009

Douche of the Day


Douche of the Day goes to Nashville Tenn., Police Chief Ronal Serpas who said after a big drug bust
last week;

"Somebody's breaking into somebody's grandmother's house to have the money to buy the weed," said Metro Police Chief Ronal Serpas. "Somebody stealing somebody's car to sell to have money to buy the weed. Somebody beating someone up because they owed them the money, the money that they used to buy the weed."

[Source http://www.wsmv.com/news/19057346/detail.html]

Thursday, March 19, 2009

Former Bush Aide says Guantanamo detainees innocent (mostly) and that B.A. knew it.

Lawrence B. Wilkerson, a Republican who was chief of staff to former-Secretary of State Colin Powell, told The Associated Press "There are still innocent people there," "Some have been there six or seven years.", talking about Guantanamo.

"Some 800 men have been held at Guantanamo since the prison opened in January 2002, and 240 remain. Wilkerson said two dozen are terrorists, including confessed Sept. 11 plotter Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who was transferred to Guantanamo from CIA custody in September 2006.

"We need to put those people in a high-security prison like the one in Colorado, forget them and throw away the key," Wilkerson said. "We can't try them because we tortured them and didn't keep an evidence trail."

Wilkerson, who flew combat missions as a helicopter pilot in Vietnam and left the government in January 2005, said he did not speak out while in government because some of the information was classified. He said he feels compelled to do so now because Cheney has claimed in recent press interviews that President Barack Obama is making the U.S. less safe by reversing Bush administration policies toward terror suspects, including ordering Guantanamo closed.

The administration is now evaluating what to do with the prisoners who remain at the U.S. military base in Cuba.

"I'm very concerned about the kinds of things Cheney is saying to make it seem Obama is a danger to this republic," Wilkerson said. "To have a former vice president fearmongering like this is really, really dangerous.""

Above story is modified, but mainly copy pasted. Read the rest of the story

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090319/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/cb_guantanamo_wrongly_held

By ANDREW O. SELSKY, Associated Press Writer


My take on Cheney,

He should shut up, and go fuck himself.